Legal Opinion

In Re Mabie

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1984No. 16279PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Petitioner seeks habeas corpus based upon a contention that Penal Code section 29331 worktime credits were improperly denied because he is a California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) committee rather than a state prison inmate. His contention is based upon an asserted deprivation of equal protection of the laws.

FACTS

Petitioner's Background

Petitioner was committed to the CRC in the civil addict program on February 5, 1982. He received a suspended sentence of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Richard M.California Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. GoodloeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. NublaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API