Legal Opinion

In Re Huffman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1986No. Crim. 24654PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

We granted review after the Court of Appeal denied a writ of habeas corpus. The question presented is whether petitioner, once confined for treatment as a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO), was denied equal protection of the laws when he, unlike offenders confined for treatment as narcotics addicts, received no “conduct” or “participation” credits against a subsequent prison term for time spent in the treatment facility. We conclude that petitioner is not entitled to such credits and will disapprove certain Court of Appeal decisions insofar as they conflict with our…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. HubbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API