Peek v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
Robert Peek (defendant) timely appeals two of his sentences. Determining that the trial court misinterpreted the habitual felony offender (HFO) statute1 to require a sentence greater than the statutory maximum, we vacate the defendant’s two second-degree felony sentences and remand for resentencing.
The defendant entered a negotiated plea on two counts of dealing in stolen property and two counts of providing false verification of ownership. He agreed to be sentenced as a HFO, with a cap on his sentences of fifteen years and one day of imprisonment. The two dealing in stolen property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Lett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- DANIEL LEON HEATLEY A K A DANIEL LEON HEATLY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Kieran Searcy v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Kierce v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Owens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025