Legal Opinion

Peek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 1, 2014No. 5D13-755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

Robert Peek (defendant) timely appeals two of his sentences. Determining that the trial court misinterpreted the habitual felony offender (HFO) statute1 to require a sentence greater than the statutory maximum, we vacate the defendant’s two second-degree felony sentences and remand for resentencing.

The defendant entered a negotiated plea on two counts of dealing in stolen property and two counts of providing false verification of ownership. He agreed to be sentenced as a HFO, with a cap on his sentences of fifteen years and one day of imprisonment. The two dealing in stolen property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Lett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DANIEL LEON HEATLEY A K A DANIEL LEON HEATLY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Kieran Searcy v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  3. Kierce v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Owens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API