Legal Opinion

McGuiggan v. Hiller Bros.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The facts adduced upon the second trial are conceded to be substantially the same as those adduced upon the first trial. They were sufficiently stated in McGuiggan v. Hiller Brothers, 209 Wis. 402, 245 N. W. 97, and therefore need not be restated here.

The circuit court was evidently of the opinion that the only questions to be determined by the jury, other than as to the amount of the damages sustained by the plaintiff, were (1) whether the negligence of the defendant, which appeared as a matter of law, was a cause of the collision; (2) whether the negligence of the plaintiff, which also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McGuiggan v. HillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Sweetman v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Friedrich v. BoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Graass v. Westerlin & Campbell Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. CarbonneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kornetzke v. Calumet CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Devine v. BischelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Biersach v. Wolf River Paper & Fiber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API