Legal Opinion
Meyer & Meyer v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1933No. 24002PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an original proceeding to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent John D. Davis, employed by Meyer & Meyer, one of the petitioners herein. The petitioners contend that the Commission was without jurisdiction to make the award for the reason that the employment of claimant did not come under the AYorkmen’s Compensation Act.
The record shows that Meyer & Meyer operate a funeral home in the city of Norman, Okla. It appears that at the time of the injury claimant was engaged in painting and decorating the woodwork in the building occupied by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harbour-Longmire-Pace Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Svoboda v. BrookingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by22 opinions
- W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Denbo v. RoarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Lamont v. Intermountain Realty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Harris v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.