Legal Opinion

State Improvement-Development Co. v. Leininger

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 18, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Equity. Action by the State Improvement-Development Company against C. W. Leininger, Register of the United States Land Office, and another. The cause was removed to the federal court by defendants on writ of certiorari, and plaintiff moves to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN FLEET, District Judge.

This is an action brought in the superior court of the state, wherein the defendant Leininger, in his official capacity as register of the United States land office at Redding, Cal., and the defendant Kingsbury, in his official capacity as surveyor general and register of the state land office of the state of California, are joined as defendants; the relief asked against the first-named officer being an injunction permanently restraining him from entering upon the official records of his office, in obedience tó instructions from his superior officers in the Land…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Chiatovich v. HanchettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Conover v. MontemuroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
  3. McMillen v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1925
  4. Egan v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lucania Societa Italiana Di Navigazione v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API