Legal Opinion

McMillen v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 4, 1925No. 6086, 6087PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed her motion to remand, and, supplemental thereto, has also filed a plea in abatement. The purpose of the plea in abatement was to reach facts not appearing of record.

The only question raised by the two pleadings is whether the defendant lost its right to remove from the state court to the federal court by serving notice to take depositions in the state court, and subsequently by actually taking such depositions. There is no question but that depositions in the cause on the part of the defendant were taken while the ease was pending in the state court.

1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Atlanta, K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Tower v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Duncan v. Associated PressU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davila v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1951
  2. Dri Mark Products, Inc. v. Meyercord Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Rockwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Beasley v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
  5. Genie MacHine Products, Inc. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API