Legal Opinion

Brenda Dickenson v. Michael Petit, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 23, 1984No. 83-1676PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.

In this class action on behalf of recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), 42 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., plaintiffs claim they have been denied benefits because the Secretary, in measuring “income” in connection with eligibility, 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(7), looks to wages before withholding, rather than to take-home pay; contending, in effect, that the $75. statutory work expense “disregard,” § 602(a)(8), is a legislative figure to compensate for expenses other than taxes. 1 Unfortunately, when Congress amended these sections in the Omnibus…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Turner v. ProdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Bell v. MassingaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. Murray, Margaret Heckler, Etc., Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Schroeder v. HegstromDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  4. State of Minnesota v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Galster v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API