Legal Opinion
Gary Herron v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 3, 2004No. 03-2802PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Gary Herron sued his former employer, DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler-Chrysler”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging race discrimination, retaliation, racial harassment, and constructive discharge. The district court granted DaimlerChrysler’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Background
Gary Herron, who is black, began working at Daimler-Chrysler’s Kokomo, Indiana transmission plant (“KTP”) in 1994. After a few months, he announced his intention to accept a supervisory position with a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Poullard v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Gabe Keri v. Board of Trustees of Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Marcella Fane v. Locke Reynolds, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Porter v. Erie Foods International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Chaney v. Plainfield Healthcare CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.