Legal Opinion

Hurst v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1984No. 4-983A311PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Kenneth Wayne Hurst is before us appealing his two consecutive sentences for the delivery of LSD to two undercover police officers. Hurst's plea for the reexamination of this 1982 case rests upon allegations of error in the following:

1. Did the trial court err in admitting the State's two exhibits of LSD without establishing a complete chain of custody?

2. Was it error for the trial court to overrule Hurst's objection to testimony that Hurst had allegedly been observed selling cocaine to a third party prior to the instant offenses?

3. Under the facts of this…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. John Anthony OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Dupin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Study v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Rumple v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API