Legal Opinion

Whitice v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 18, 1936Published

1Per curiam

— Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the Circuit Court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 Sou. Rep. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179; 79 So. 450.

Reversed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford; and Davis, J. J., concur.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Woodward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API