Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 29, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Howell was convicted of the offense denounced by Chapter 8596, General Laws of Florida, Acts 1921, now Section 7552 C. G. L., 5409 R. G. S., as amended. The principal issue at the trial of this case was whether or not the State established beyond a reasonable doubt, as it was required to do under the law in order to sustain a conviction, the alleged previous chaste character of the prosecuting female witness who was unmarried and was under the age of eighteen years at the time plaintiff in error was accused of having had unlawful carnal intercourse with her in violation of the above cited…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Woodward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leroy Kimes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Nipper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Whitice v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API