Legal Opinion

Potter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1987No. 52936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Movant was convicted in the Circuit Court, St. Charles County of selling a controlled substance. This was his second offense and he was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. The court of appeals affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. A detailed discussion of the facts appear in State v. Potter, 711 S.W.2d 539 (Mo.App. 1986). Movant subsequently filed a Rule 27.26 motion and an evidentiary hearing *232was held on the motion. The hearing court issued “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” denying movant’s petition for relief.

On appeal movant contends that the hearing court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Peeler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Luckett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API