Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1989No. 54870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Movant, Fred Hamilton, appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Hamilton was convicted of sodomizing his young son, in violation of RSMo § 566.060 (1986), and attempting to sodomize the son, in violation of RSMo §§ 564.011 & 566.060 (1986). He was sentenced to six years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Hamilton, 729 S.W.2d 519 (Mo.App., E.D.1987). Hamilton now alleges that he received ineffective assistance in that defense counsel did not contact and call five potential witnesses;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. ProwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Leisure v. BowersoxDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
  5. Sitton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API