Legal Opinion

White Deer Township v. Napp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2006No. 143 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This appeal concerns whether the common pleas court correctly terminated a municipality’s challenge to the receipt by Second Class Township supervisors and their spouses of post-retirement medical insurance benefits that the supervisors themselves authorized.

Charles Napp, Leonard Caris, and Carl Hartranft (deceased) are former supervisors and employees of White Deer Township, a municipality organized under the provisions of the Second Class Township Code. 1 , 2 In December 1997, at a time when they had worked for the Township for more than twenty years, Messrs. Napp,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. McNeil v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Lower Merion Fraternal Order of Police Lodge Number Twenty-Eight v. Township of Lower MerionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Fairview Township v. Fairview Township Police Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Newport Township v. MargalisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seebold v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. White Deer Township v. NappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. White Deer Township v. NappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. White Deer Township v. NappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API