Corrigan v. Stiltz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
The parties to this appeal (referred to hereinafter as “Ray” and “Rita”) were formerly husband and wife. The decree terminating their marriage awarded to each of them as undivided interest as tenants in common in real property known as the Corriganville Ranch, as well as personalty and appurtenances thereon situated. In 1955 the ranch was leased by Ray and Rita to Outdoor Amusements, Inc., whose subsequent operation of the property did not prosper. In 1957 Ray filed suit against the corporation for breach of various covenants—Rita did not join as a party plaintiff and was accordingly made a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Rouse v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Choi v. Sagemark Consulting, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.