Legal Opinion

Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 7, 2009No. Case 1:08-cv-1084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Terminating and Closing the Case

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.

This is a premises-liability action under Michigan law. 1 Mark Leys and his wife Naesha Leys (together, “Leys”) sued Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. (“Lowe’s”) in Michigan state court, and Lowe’s filed a notice invoking this court’s diversity removal jurisdiction. Neither the Leys’ complaint nor Lowe’s removal papers alleged facts sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, this court ordered Lowe’s to show cause, no later than February 9, 2009, why…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Crehan v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. Harshaw v. Bethany Christian ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. Marshall v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API