Overbay v. Ledridge

In our former opinion, Overbay v. Ledridge, 97 Or App 292, 776 P2d 29 (1989), we held that the court did not err when it dismissed plaintiffs claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress. ORCP 21A(8). As to the latter claim, we held that plaintiff had failed to allege that defendants had the requisite intent. Our opinion quoted allegations of plaintiffs complaint:

“ ‘[Defendants’] insertion of the legal description for parcel B in the decree in the contract foreclosure was done intentionally and/or recklessly and constituted extreme and outrageous conduct.

“ ‘As a direct…