Legal Opinion

Overbay v. Ledridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1989No. 85-5-29884; CA A48512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

1, 2. Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing her claims against defendants Smith and Johnson (defendants)1 for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress. She assigns as error that the court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the claims on the ground that, in each instance, plaintiff had failed to allege ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21A(8). We affirm.

In an earlier action, defendants had brought a real estate contract foreclosure action against plaintiff and her husband. The facts are recited in Johnson v. Overbay, 85 Or App 576, 737 P2d 1251,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Coy v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Western Surety Co., a Texas Corporation v. Bank of Southern Oregon, an Oregon State Chartered BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Overbay v. LedridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API