Legal Opinion

Moerman v. Prairie Rose Resources, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2013No. DA 12-0666PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Irene and John Moerman appeal the judgment and order of the District Court for the Seventh Judicial District, Wibaux County, denying their claim that the oil and gas lease at issue in this case has expired or has been forfeited. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court correctly concluded that the parties’ oil and gas lease remained in effect.

¶4 2. Whether the District Court was correct in awarding Prairie Rose Resources, Inc. (Prairie), its attorney fees.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶5 Irene and John Moerman (the Moermans) lived on a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Fey v. A. A. Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Christian v. AA Oil CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fleck v. Missouri River Royalty Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API