Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Gregory

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 7, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On motion, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Magie, Chancellor.

Gounsel for the defendant moves, upon notice and accompanying affidavits, for relief of various sorts. Briefly stated, he seeks to have the chancellor refrain from signing a decree advised by a vice-chancellor and direct the further trial of the issue presented in the cause before the same, or another vice-chancellor, or by the chancellor himself.

In order to an understanding of the cause and the conclusions I have reached, a brief statement of the pleadings and issues presented before the vice-chancellor who advised the decree seems necessary.

The petition filed by the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. W.D. Cashin Co. v. Alamac Hotel Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. In Re HagueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Kicey v. KiceyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. The Scranton v. Neonlite C. of Am.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API