Plum Township Annexation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.:
I agree with the majority that the evidence supports' the order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County in this annexation proceeding, and therefore I concur in the conclusion of the majority that the action of that court should be affirmed.
I disagree, however, with the conclusion that our scope of review, under section 1010 of the Borough *384Code, as amended, 53 PS §12900, in appeals involving annexation ordinances, is limited to that of a narrow certiorari. This Court should adhere to its many recent decisions holding that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Delaware County National Bank v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.