Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. . Boomer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The question for decision is this: Where bonds regularly issued by a drainage district duly established, organized and existing under and by virtue of chapter 442, Public Laws of 1909, as amended, subchapter III of chapter 94, section 5312 et seq., of Consolidated Statutes of 1919, as amended, pertaining to the establishment of drainage districts, for the payment of which assessments duly made under authority of said act are due and unpaid, may the holder of such bonds maintain an action against an individual owner of land within the district for the foreclosure of the lien of such unpaid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guilford v. . Georgia Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Committee on Grievances of the North Carolina State Bar Ass'n v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . HinsdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Middle Canal Co. v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Wilson v. Town of MooresvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Riddick v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Worley v. . PipesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Board of County Com'rs. v. Bench Canal Drainage Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API