Kelly v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from a judgment. A statement of the facts is unnecessary. The record presents the inquiry whether a trust company can buy from itself securities which it owns for an estate which it holds in trust.
At common law this could not be done. St. Paul Tr. Co. v. Strong, 85 Minn. 1, 88 N. W. 256. When the Strong case was decided in December, 1901, our legislature had not changed the .rule. It was therein stated that had the legislature intended to depart from the common law rule, resting on principles and morals, it would not let its intention rest upon implication but would have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Hawley v. KnottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Larson v. Security Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Verbon v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Bowden v. Citizens Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.