Love v. Mewborn
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that the twenty-four hour reconciliation of the parties terminated defendant’s “alimony” obligations. It is well settled that a single act of sexual intercourse between a husband and wife constitutes a reconciliation and terminates alimony obligations. Murphy v. Murphy, 295 N.C. 390, 245 S.E. 2d 693 (1978). However, property settlements may be executed before, during or after marriage and are not necessarily terminated by reconciliation. See G.S. 50-20(d); Buffington v. Buffington, 69 N.C. App. 483, 317 S.E. 2d 97 (1984). Thus the central issue on this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Buffington v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Powell v. Peachtree Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Higgins v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988