Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Higgins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 486A87PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The resolution of this appeal depends on the interpretation of the words of the agreement “if the parties have lived continuously separate and apart for that full period” (one year). It is undisputed that the parties engaged in sexual intercourse during that period. If these words are not ambiguous and to live separate and apart means the parties may not engage in sexual intercourse during that period, summary judgment was properly granted for the appellee. We believe that we are required to hold under Murphy v. Murphy, 295 N.C. 390, 245 S.E. 2d 693 (1978) and State v. Gossett,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Buffington v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. . GossettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Love v. MewbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caldwell Freight v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Caldwell Freight Lines, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API