Legal Opinion

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2021No. 2:16-cv-01828Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-01828-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 G. KAUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gerald Spence’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 18 Reconsideration of the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 113) granting 19 Defendants G. Kaur and Chambers’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Request for an Extension of 20 Time (ECF No. 112). (ECF No. 118.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is 21 DENIED. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 ///…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
  3. Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Thomas Burdick, Estate of Perrin v. Burdick v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peters' BakeryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API