Legal Opinion

Davis v. Van Buren Sch. Dist.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2019No. CV-18-544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenneth S. Hixson, Judge

Appellant Michelle Davis appeals from a final order dismissing her complaint in favor of appellee Van Buren School District. On appeal, appellant contends that the circuit court erred in ruling that the job-performance records at issue are not subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Arkansas Code Annotated sections 25-19-101 through -110 (Repl. 2015). We affirm.

*468I. Relevant Facts

Appellant filed her complaint on March 2, 2017, under FOIA to compel appellee to provide all records of the Van Buren School District pertaining to two investigations involving altercations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Orsini v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Fox v. PerroniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Nabholz Construction Corp. v. Contractors for Public Protection Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Thomas v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Harrill & Sutter, PLLC v. FarrarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Pulaski County Special School District; Charles McNulty, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Pulaski County Special School District and Custodian of Certain Records; And Valerie Bailey, in Her Official Capacity as Public Information Specialist v. Russell R. RacopCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API