Legal Opinion

Harrill & Sutter, PLLC v. Farrar

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 2012No. 11-894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

1 , Appellant Harrill & Sutter, PLLC, appeals an order of the Saline County Circuit Court finding that appellees Dr. Hank Farrar, Dr. Lanessa Bass, Dr. Tonya Thompson, Mariam T. Hopkins, and Anderson, Murphy & Hopkins, LLP, were not the custodians for the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to appel-lee Allan Sugg, in his official capacity, or to appellee University of Arkansas Board of Trustees, or to University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS); that they did not have administrative control of the public records of those entities; that the records…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Legislative Joint Auditing Committee v. WoosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Bedell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Fox v. PerroniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Swaney v. TilfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hollis v. Fayetteville School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Bradshaw v. Fort Smith School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Davis v. Van Buren Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Gildehaus v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Gildehaus v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API