Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Siroky

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 5, 1996No. 95-5004; Crim. App. No. 30646Published

1ConcurrenceGierke, Judge

I agree with the result and most of the rationale of the majority opinion. I write separately to comment on the standard of review articulated by the majority. 44 MJ at 398-399. I agree that in most cases we must pierce the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision and examine the military judge’s ruling, but I am concerned with the majority’s apparent lack of deference to the court below where it has exercised its independent fact-finding power.

Unlike an intermediate appellate court in the civilian judicial system, the Court of Criminal Appeals has unique powers under Article 66(c), Uniform Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. FacianeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. ManuelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API