Legal Opinion
Alba v. Urology Associates of Kingston
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 1991No. 2862PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN Judge:
This appeal is from an order of September 9, 1990, entered by the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas denying appellants’ petition to open a default judgment. Appellants, Urology Associates of Kingston and Ira C. Grossman, M.D., contend that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their petition because prior notice of entry of the judgment was not given, nor was such notice excused under Pa.R.Civ.P. 237.1. We agree and accordingly vacate the order and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Appellee, Catherine Alba, contends that she was injured because of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruczynski v. Jesray Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- McFarland v. WhithamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Johnson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Central Penn National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Myers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Castings Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.