Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Aurotek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1985No. Nos. 84-3644, 84-3645PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants Matheson, Peters, and Rutledge formed a joint venture to exploit the Yosemite mining claim in Idaho, one of a number of claims owned by Mother Lode, a corporation. The three purchased 75% of Mother Lode’s stock, and caused Mother Lode to transfer the mining claims to themselves as joint holders. They also informed Aurotek, a corporation, to develop the Yosemite claim, each taking one-third of its stock. Rutledge was to raise the necessary capital and see that required legal work was done; Matheson was responsible for the day-to-day operations of the venture; and Peters was to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. SEC v. PhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Ryder International Corporation, a Corporation v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Wayne Jett v. Jeffrey S. Sunderman Sunrise Enterprise Corporation National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh and Union Planters BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cross Financial Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API