Legal Opinion
Turner v. Farnam
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 18, 2003No. CA 02-1360PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.
Appellant James Turner from the trial court’s denial of his motions to intervene and quash a writ of garnishment. We affirm.
On August 1, 2000, appellees John and Sara Farnam sued Turner Motor Company, Inc. (“TMC”) to rescind their purchase of a 1994 Ford Explorer. They alleged that the vehicle, for which they had paid $11,995, had suffered extensive damage and had a salvage title, contrary to TMC’s representations. TMC answered the complaint through its attorney and denied that it had misrepresented the history of the vehicle. The answer was verified by appellant as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hercules Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Joey Brown Interest, Inc. v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Nash v. ESTATE OF SWAFFERSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Pine Bluff National Bank v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Northwest Arkansas Area Agency on Aging v. GolmonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hooten v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Christopher J. White v. Lisa M. Johnson v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Joseph Lucas, an Individual; Glen Lucas, an Individual; Robert Lucas, an Individual; Barbara Johnson, an Individual; Thomas Lucas, an Individual; And David Abbott, an Individual v. Washington County; Pamela Vitko, as Personal Representative and on Behalf of the Laura Lee Broderick Estate; Cecily Lennard Lucas, as Personal Representative and on Behalf of the John P. Lucas Estate; And Victoria GilbertieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Hooten v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006