Legal Opinion

Danner v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Tennessee Supreme Court

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2009No. 08-6075UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOK, Circuit Judge.

David Danner sued the Tennessee Supreme Court’s Board of Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) and its former Disciplinary Counsel, Charles High, during a Board investigation of complaints filed by Danner’s former clients. The district court dismissed his case without prejudice under the abstention doctrine articulated in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Danner appeals, and we affirm.

I

We review de novo a district court’s order declining federal jurisdiction on grounds of Younger abstention. Fieger v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 740, 743 (6th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Geoffrey N. Fieger v. Philip J. Thomas, Grievance Administrator, and Michigan Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Carole R. Squire v. Jonathan E. CoughlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Danner v. Board of Professional Responsibility of Tennessee Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. LeFaiverDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
  2. Tennessee State of v. GibbonsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API