Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. R.R. v. Raymond

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1878No. 5456PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco. The defendants demurred, and the demurrer having been sustained, the plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court :

The plaintiff is a railroad corporation, and seeks in this proceeding to condemn certain -lands of the defendants, as a site whereon “ to erect and maintain permanent and suitable build*227ings for work-shops, for repairing the cars and locomotives of plaintiff, and for safely keeping its cars and locomotives.” The defendants contest the right of the plaintiff to condemn the land, on the ground that the use to which the land is to be applied is not a public use, within the purview of the statute defining the conditions on which a railroad corporation may invoke the exercise of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Pacific Ry. Co. v. FeldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Ryan v. Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Moran v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchos WaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API