Legal Opinion

City of Huntsville v. COLSA CORP.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 2011No. 1091797PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

The City of Huntsville (“the City”) appeals from a summary judgment ordering the City to refund to COLSA Corporation (“COLSA”) $982,933.99 in taxes the City had assessed against COLSA, plus interest. We vacate the judgment, dismiss the case, and dismiss the appeal.

I. Factual Background

COLSA describes itself as a “technology service and solutions company,” which engineers, designs, and tests weapons-systems programs for the United States Department of Defense, pursuant either to its own prime government contracts or to its subcontracts with other entities for similar work. 1 A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. ShabaniSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Dunning v. New England Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. GEN. MOTORS ACCEP. CORP. v. City of Red BaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLCSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Attenta, Inc. v. CalhounSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. A.N.M. v. R.C.W. (Appeal from Marshall Juvenile Court: CS-17-900134.02).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2023
  4. Ex parte Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Alabama Always, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-231).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024
  5. Ex parte Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Alabama Always, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-231).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API