City of Huntsville v. COLSA CORP.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
WOODALL, Justice.
The City of Huntsville (“the City”) appeals from a summary judgment ordering the City to refund to COLSA Corporation (“COLSA”) $982,933.99 in taxes the City had assessed against COLSA, plus interest. We vacate the judgment, dismiss the case, and dismiss the appeal.
I. Factual Background
COLSA describes itself as a “technology service and solutions company,” which engineers, designs, and tests weapons-systems programs for the United States Department of Defense, pursuant either to its own prime government contracts or to its subcontracts with other entities for similar work. 1 A…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. ShabaniSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Dunning v. New England Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- GEN. MOTORS ACCEP. CORP. v. City of Red BaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
3Cited by13 opinions
- Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLCSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Attenta, Inc. v. CalhounSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- A.N.M. v. R.C.W. (Appeal from Marshall Juvenile Court: CS-17-900134.02).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2023
- Ex parte Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Alabama Always, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-231).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024
- Ex parte Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Alabama Always, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-231).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.