Legal Opinion

Attenta, Inc. v. Calhoun

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 2012No. 1100742PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Lula Calhoun, based on her claim alleging the tort of outrage against Attenta, Inc. (“Attenta”), the third-party administrator of the workers’ compensation program for Linden Lumber Company, Inc. (“Linden”). We vacate the judgment and dismiss the case and the appeal.

I. Factual and Procedural History

This case ultimately arose out of a workplace accident in which Robert Lee Calhoun, Jr., the husband of Lula Calhoun, was fatally injured while employed by Linden. On March 14, 2003, following his death, Calhoun filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ex Parte BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. BellSouth Mobility, Inc. v. Cellulink, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Mpq v. Birmingham Realty Company, 1091582 (Ala. 8-12-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Taylor v. Paradise Missionary Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API