Legal Opinion
Tanksley v. Daniels
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 28, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0081PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Slomsky, District Judge
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.;.277
II. BACKGROUND...277
III. STANDARD OF REVIEW.. .279
IV. ANALYSIS...280
*277A. Plaintiff Has Not Plausibly Alleged a Claim of Copyright Infringement Against Fox Defendants.. .280
1. Summary of the Two Works... 281.2. Substantial Similarity Analysis. . .286
B. Plaintiff Has Not Plausibly Alleged a Claim of Contributory Copyright Infringement Against Sharon Pinken-son and the Greater Philadelphia Film Office.. .294.
C. Plaintiff Has Not Plausibly Alleged a Claim of Negligence Against Sharon Pinkenson and the Greater Philadelphia Film…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clayton Tanksley v. Lee DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Nicassio v. Viacom Int'l, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Kelley v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Mapp v. UMG Recordings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2018
- After II Movie, LLC v. Grande Communications Networks LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.