South Carolina State Highway Department v. Nasim
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This appeal by the South Carolina Highway Department grows out of a land condemnation proceeding. The highway department has acquired for public use an 18/100 acre lot belonging to Mr. Nasim, the landowner. A trial was held before a jury, and the only issue involved was the amount of compensation the highway department should pay the landowner. The jury was charged that under the evidence it could award not less than $550 and not more than $3000. The award was for $2000.
After all evidence was submitted, counsel argued to the jury. Counsel for the highway department did not object to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Johnson Ex Rel. Herrington v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Harper v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Edwards v. Union Buffalo Mills Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Toyota of Florence, Inc. v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Dial Ex Rel. Estate of Dial v. Niggel Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.