Legal Opinion

Seymour v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1984No. Civ. 22606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, Acting P. J.

Cross-complainant Bruce Seymour (hereafter plaintiff) appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of cross-defendant State of California (hereafter defendant). We affirm.

In his first amended cross-complaint, plaintiff asserted two causes of action against defendant. The first cause of action charged estoppel, and was based upon assurances and representations made to plaintiff by employees of the Employment Development Department that if plaintiff could find a suitable building in the City of Modesto…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Santa Monica Unified School District v. PershCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bear River Sand & Gravel Corp. v. County of PlacerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Poway Royal Mobilehome Owners Ass'n v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. First Street Plaza Partners v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Torres v. City of MontebelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. El Camino Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API