Legal Opinion
Romig v. City of Iola, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 11, 1998No. 98-2053-JWLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ralph James Romig filed suit against defendant City of Iola alleging that the City failed to hire him on the basis of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. This matter is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 29). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted and plaintiffs complaint is dismissed in its entirety.
I. Facts 1
Plaintiff Ralph James Romig has a long history in the field of law enforcement. He earned both a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999