Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Wichita State University

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 9, 1994No. 70,684PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

Sheryl Bryson and Cindy Vanover appeal the trial court’s grant of Wichita State University’s (WSU) motion for directed verdict on the ground plaintiffs’ suit was time barred.

We reverse and remand.

WSU decided to split one of its departments into two new departments and hire two new executive directors. The new people were hired by Robert Harts ook, Vice President for University Advancement. The new organization was approved by Roger Lowe, Vice President, Administration and Finance, and by Warren Armstrong, WSU President.

Plaintiffs were hired for the new positions, and those…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. RedmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Hecht v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Roe v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bielicki v. Terminix International Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Roof-Techs International, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  3. Ives v. McGannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. Moss v. MamalisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. Evolution, Inc. v. SunTrust BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API