Legal Opinion

Kneas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Robert Kneas (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant the suspension petition of Cross Country Clothes (Employer) based on Claimant’s refusal to undergo surgery for his work-related injury.1

On January 31, 1994, Employer petitioned for the suspension of Claimant’s benefits, alleging that Claimant had refused reasonable medical treatment in the form of surgery for his work-related injury. Claimant filed an answer denying the material allegations of the petition, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Kraushaar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Sears v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Alltel, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Osborne Associates, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Bereznicki v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API