Legal Opinion
Thomas Day Co. v. Doble Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1930No. 6050PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, a research corporation and the holder of two combination patents —Doble No. 1,131,683, issued March 10, 1915, and Doble No. 1,359,042, issued November 16, 1920 — by its bill of complaint charged the appellant with infringement of claim No. 1 of the first and claims 2, 3, and 4 of the second, in that it was selling in California what was referred to in the record as the Oil-O-Matie heating device manufactured by the Williams Oil-O-Matie Heating Corporation of Bloomington, Ill. While the manufacturer was not formally made a party, through its counsel it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Keszthelyi v. Doheny Stone Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Danforth v. Northill Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Turner v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.