Legal Opinion

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Peele

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1927No. 12,751PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while employed by appellant as yard conductor in switching cars, such injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant in placing its tracks with insufficient clearance.

To the complaint appellant filed answer in general denial and an affirmative answer pleading assumption of risk. Reply in denial.

On the trial before a jury, a verdict was returned in favor of appellee for $7,500. Appellant filed motion for a new trial which was overruled, and judgment was rendered on the verdict.

Appellant has assigned as error…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. SwearingenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Charlton v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conkey v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API