Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Roberts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1903No. 20,036PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Daviess Circuit Court; H. Q. Houghton, Judge. Action by Edward M. Roberts against the Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company. From ajudg-' ment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— Action by appellee against appellant for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of the latter while in its employ as a switchman.

The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer for insufficiency of facts was overruled. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict returned finding expressly in favor of plaintiff on both the first and second paragraphs of his (jomplaint, and damages were assessed in the sum of $3,000, and, over appellant’s motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered for that amount.

The errors assigned are based on overruling the demurrer to each…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. WelchIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Johnston v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Grimm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. HardsawIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API