Legal Opinion

Brown Method Co. v. Ginsberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 8, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The appeal in this case is by the plaintiff in a suit for a stipulated yearly license fee for use of a patented device. Judgment was entered for the defendant upon a verdict directed by the trial court, and the single exception taken is one to the direction of the verdict.

The appellant, a corporation engaged in business in New York City, is the owner of patents for a device to facilitate alterations by retailers in ready-made trousers, to suit customers, and it granted to the appellees in Baltimore City, by a written contract, a license to make and sell trousers with this device, for an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. St. Paul Plow Works v. StarlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Sproull v. Pratt & Whitney Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  4. Hall v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  5. Aetna Indemnity Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. University Emergency Medicine Foundation v. Rapier Investments, Ltd and Medical Business Systems, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Fromen v. Goose Creek Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Prison Health Services, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Lewis-Hale Coal Co. v. Enterprise Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API