Salinas v. Martin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment upon a finding that respondent owed no duty of care to prevent an attack of appellant by a pit bull present on respondent’s property with his express consent. We conclude that respondent owed a duty of care to appellant and reverse the judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Respondent was the owner of a residence located on McLaughlin Street in Richmond. In 2005, he embarked upon a remodeling project at the residence that included construction of a new foundation. Respondent hired Burle Southard to act as general contractor…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. PrasadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Staats v. Vintner's Golf Club, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Albillo v. Ports O'Call Restaurant Corp. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Estate of St. John v. SchaefflerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Garcia v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.