Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bingham County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1957No. 8518PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

It is admitted that respondent on March 25, 1955, at the time of the happening of the event hereinafter described, was engaged in the duties of his employment; also, that some eight hours afterward he evidenced a personal injury which had resulted in violence to the physical structure of his body, in that he had suffered a hemorrhage of a branch of an artery supplying the right cortex of his brain, which produced complete and permanent paralysis of his left arm and left leg.

Respondent, as weed control supervisor of appellant Bingham County, with headquarters at Blackfoot, after…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. J. Norman Geipe, Inc. v. CollettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Charon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Todd v. GoostreeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Beutler v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Comish v. J. R. Simplot Fertilizer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Laird v. State Highway DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API