Legal Opinion
Holman v. Laulo-Rowe Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1993No. 91-35771PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
994 F.2d 666
Hugh H. HOLMAN and Gayle L. Holman,
Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,
v.
LAULO-ROWE AGENCY; George Laulo, individually; Terry Rowe,
individually; George Laulo and Terry Rowe, d/b/a
Laulo-Rowe Agency,
Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 91-35771, 91-35772.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992.
Decided May 24, 1993.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Maynard v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Independent Energy Producers Ass'n v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Randy Rudel v. Hawaii Management AllianceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Sullivan v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.